Teaching: It’s not ALL about the kids.

Yesterday, I bent my virtual ear toward a Twitter discussion about teachers. The topic: Provisions in teacher contracts do not always benefit both teachers and students at the same time. Some provisions can actually disrupt student learning.

Ignoring the fact that I had not been invited in to the conversation, I chimed in anyhow. I pointed out that class size and composition issues correlate very well in terms of benefits or detriments. It was quickly pointed out to me that there are other contract provisions that don’t correlate so well.

Fearing the depth of the virtual waters I was about to wade into, I ventured to ask for an example of what those provisions might be. The immediate reply was “maternity leave in October.”

This indeed may be a concern for students, especially younger students, for whom relationship with the teacher is very important. However, the answer rattled me a bit. Maternity leave? I suppose the same concern could be raised with sick leave. So teachers should not be allowed to get pregnant (or sick) if it disrupts the class? An oversimplification, perhaps, but we “went there”, didn’t we?

Aside from issues affecting teachers’ human rights, there are other teacher contract provisions that can disrupt learning environments. Sometimes teachers miss class due to other professional obligations, or scheduled professional development. Sometimes there can be restructuring of classes due to unforeseen enrolment issues. Sometimes teachers leave because they are promoted, or they have a new job opportunity.

These are certainly inconveniences, but the very mention of them gets my blood boiling. Inconveniences to clients due to issues that benefit workers or the longterm wellbeing of the system exist in every workplace. Lawyers, doctors, bankers, accountants and politicians: All of these schedule their time in ways that are not always convenient to their clients.

These examples may be obvious, but for some reason, when it comes to teaching, it is not obvious why inconveniences to students should to be tolerated.

The very fact that maternity leave is even mentioned gives me great pause.

It was not long ago in Canada that teachers, particularly teachers of young children tended to be either nuns or other women who did not have anyone depending on them. There were actual policies in place that mandated that women quit teaching once they got married.

Professor Emeritus, Pat Schmuck (University of Oregon) tells a story of a teaching job interview early in her career in which she was asked point blank if she was using birth control. She laughingly tells her (adult) students that she responded forthrightly because at the time, she thought, “Of course they’d want to know if there was a possibility I’d be having babies and needing time away from the school.” She laughs at her naiveté and at how complacent everyone was in days gone by of an inherently sexist vision for the work world, particularly the world of teaching.

I submit that the larger societal view of teaching still hangs on to remnants of this sexist vision: a vision that teaching is a “vocation”, and not a job; a vision that the students come first in teachers’ personal lives; a vision that teacher volunteerism is “part of the job”.

This is not fair. Teachers, while they themselves may be mothers, are not everyone’s mothers. Teachers enter the profession because they are passionate about education, and therefore, they bring a professional commitment and ethic to their charges, but that doesn’t mean that they should be taken advantage of.

Convenience should not be the only directive guiding contractual obligations for teachers, or anyone else. We work FOR A LIVING, not just for the students.



4 thoughts on “Teaching: It’s not ALL about the kids.

  1. I was the one that mentioned maternity leave on twitter. Twitter is really an awful place to discuss such big issues. What I would love to see is a system well funded enough that if a teacher needs to take her maternity leave in October, she could mentor another teacher who is just starting out, or do a research project that would be of interest to her school or district. When I was working in an office, we did this type of planning. An accountant would not take on a new project right before taking Maternity leave.

    1. Yes. Indeed. I obviously jumped to a conclusion about where you were going with the comment. There used to be a provision for (I think) 2 days’ transition time for a teacher leaving for a long time to help smooth the transition for kids. A T.O.C. would come in for those two days and the two teachers would work together to discuss routines, units already taught, program goals, etc.

      When I think back on this, I can’t help but be reminded of how good the system was before the Liberals got into power and started the systematic de-funding of it, starting with 2005 when they didn’t increase funding to reflect the 2.5% teachers salary increase.

      Thank you for your candidness. I wonder, would you agree that there are sexist traditions that still linger in the public attitude toward teachers?

      Also. Though I didn’t mention them, there are other contractual obligations that cause inconvenience for students. One year my school’s September enrolment was far higher than had been anticipated. It took until October to get approval to hire more teachers. We had to restructure the whole timetable a week into October. I began teaching Social Studies 10. My class was dismantled and I had to switch to Social Studies 9. I had never taught either class before, so I had my year plan ready to go for SS10, and had to scrap it and scramble for SS9. Not the best for me or the students, at least in the short term.

      Thanks for your comment.

      1. Sexism is a problem through out our society, so there is no doubt that it influences our attitudes towards teachers.

        We also had a year when my sons were in elementary that it was not until the second week of October before classes were set. It is hard on the kids.

    2. Excellent post and a much appreciated clarification. While I agree with Ramona’s suggestion in theory, 8th month of pregnancy might not be the best time to start a professional research project. Working September as a resource teacher or other support role would be best, $$ permitting.

Note: Comments must focus on issues. Any comments containing derisive tone or insulting language will be deleted. You may disagree vociferously, but you must be respectful. For example, no sarcasm is allowed.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s